|
|
Post by rivertrapper316 on Jul 19, 2008 20:22:35 GMT -5
I thought I just mised my comment when I looked at it the first time Tim posted it . But I have looked it over three Times tonight and my name is not in there. If mine was left out How many more was left out of it?  |
|
|
|
Post by trapperknox on Jul 20, 2008 8:33:59 GMT -5
That's should be expected when a anti-rabid DNR takes over. They can play just as dirty, which is pretty sad. Their supposed to uphold the law (I know of Natural Resources) and here they are playing as the rich guy who buys him way out by taking a few words out... it ticks me off how shallow the ID DNR has gotten
|
|
|
|
Post by Tim Rose on Jul 22, 2008 8:09:25 GMT -5
rivertrapper.....sorry to hear your comment was ommited.....I could talk more about this....but we were wronged and the HSUS people were allowed to submit anything (way off track from the rule change and that was allowed)...........but, trappers were ommitted if there comments weren't directly related (in the eyes of the hearing officer) to the rule change...
Very unfair...we have been railroaded the whole way and this is another example.
|
|
|
|
Post by rivertrapper316 on Jul 23, 2008 0:36:59 GMT -5
Tim I know we was dealt a bad hand in this thing from the start. I was not able to get to the meeting that was so well planed if they would of went a little more north they could of got it out of state. LOL. But work was the problem more then the distance . After talking with Schilling it was probably best that I didn’t go because driving 300 miles and not being able to talk at a PUBLIC MEETING would have put me in a very badddddd mood.  As for as the comment that I sent in it was not out in left field it was short and to the point and it was the truth about the situation at hand, nothing more nothing less. It just pisses me off that I have been in this thing from the start and when you read down the list it makes me look like I had no interest in it . But hell when have I ever give a chit what other people thought about me. Well I will get off my box now. |
|
|
|
Post by Tim Rose on Jul 23, 2008 6:29:38 GMT -5
Rivertrapper...I know you have been involed through this whole deal and know where you stand (defending trappers rights)
Spoke with another guy last night (at the FTA7B meeting) that said his submitted comments were not included in the long DNR hearing officers findings document that was sent out through the link.......That document was for the public comments on the proposed rule change....I mean...ummm....ahhh....some of the publics comments were more important than others...umm...ahhh...i mean...its a fair and un-bias process......ummm....yepper....
This was the most bs way of getting a proposed rule change past.....it would make you puke if everyone knew the details on the shinnagins...bob knows most of them, that is why he pukes almost daily...maybe hourly...lol
|
|
|
|
Post by rivertrapper316 on Jul 24, 2008 0:34:46 GMT -5
Yepper it is BS.
Just herd on the news when driving home tonight that the IN. DNR is set to lose like 14 million out of there budget. Maybe they will get rid of some of the idiots they got...... No they will just close the parks that the public uses so they can keep there job give me a dam break………………..
|
|
|
|
Post by bobwendt on Jul 24, 2008 5:33:21 GMT -5
that`s great news! they don`t deserve any money imo. if they refuse to manage, and prefer protectionism, then no need for them to exist at all.
|
|
|
|
Post by furbuy46 on Jul 24, 2008 7:56:13 GMT -5
All they will do is raise fees some more. Charge for a few more things that ought to be free to start with.
|
|
